ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2025
Comparing Provider and Adolescent Estimates of Postoperative Opioid Use.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMost adolescents report unused opioids after surgery. Current interventions compare opioid prescribing between surgeons without capturing actual patient-reported use.
methodsWe recruited pediatric surgery residents, fellows, advanced practitioners, and surgeons from four surgical divisions at a tertiary care children's hospital. Providers reviewed clinical vignettes based on adolescent-reported postoperative opioid use data from our institution. Afterward, providers were asked to select the number of opioid pills they would prescribe and compare their responses to adolescent-reported use. We then measured provider willingness to change prescribing practices based on this comparison.
resultsOverall, provider response rate was 41.3% (N = 38/92). Providers underestimated the number of opioids used for posterior spinal fusion, open pectus excavatum repair, open pectus carinatum repair, knee arthroscopy, and tonsillectomy and overestimated opioid use following hip reconstruction. Differences in median postoperative opioid use estimates from providers versus adolescent-reported use were significant for knee arthroscopy (10 interquartile range [IQR, 0-3] versus 3 IQR [1.5-13]; P < 0.001) and tonsillectomy (0 IQR [0-2.5] versus 1 IQR [0-7]; P = 0.043). Overall, general pediatric surgery providers underestimated opioid use while orthopedic and cardiothoracic providers overestimated opioid use. Differences between provider specialty were significant for posterior spinal fusion (P = 0.022), knee arthroscopy (P < 0.001), and tonsillectomy (P = 0.005). The number of opioids prescribed varied by provider role and 88.9% of providers (N = 32/36) reported that they would change prescribing habits based on adolescent reports.
conclusionsThere are differences in provider estimates of postoperative prescription opioid use versus adolescent-reported use. Fortunately, providers report a willingness to change prescribing practice based on these differences. Feedback incorporating patient-reported postoperative opioid use may be a more accurate and patient-centered way to decrease excess opioid prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.