ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Alternative Dosing Regimens of Tislelizumab Using a Pharmacometrics Model-Based Approach.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-Informed Development of a Subcutaneous Formulation of Tislelizumab: Phase 1 Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Cancer.Clinical and translational science · 2026Trial
- Phase Ib/II Study of Zanidatamab in Combination with Tislelizumab and Chemotherapy in First-Line HER2-Positive Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Toward adaptive therapeutic timing: integration of mechanistic pharmacology and artificial intelligence in precision dosing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) is approved for the treatment of multiple cancers. We used a model-based approach to propose three alternative dosing regimens, 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W, with the aims of providing flexible treatment regimens compatible with background chemotherapy and/or reducing infusion visits. A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate pharmacokinetic exposure of the alternative regimens. Regulatory guidance on alternative dosing was used to define pharmacokinetics-based criteria. Alternative doses were selected by simulation, exposure matching, and comparison to the reference regimen of 200 mg Q3W. Deviations from pharmacokinetics-based criteria were bridged using appropriate safety and efficacy references and exposure-response analyses. All three alternative dosing regimens produced comparable exposures versus 200 mg Q3W. Although simulated peak serum concentration (C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.