Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40286295›Full record

ArticleMolecular human reproduction2025

Roles of chromosomal and gonadal sex in the fetal and placental responses to maternal food restriction in mice.

Jess C Hercus, Daniel Alejandro Salcedo Rubio, Maria Elisa Osorio Nieto, Cheayeong Keum, Qi Wang, John A Macdonald, Jordan S Scott, Emily R J Lucas, Julian K Christians

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular human reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jess C HercusDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Daniel Alejandro Salcedo RubioDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Maria Elisa Osorio NietoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Cheayeong KeumDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-0833-642X
Qi WangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
John A MacdonaldDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Jordan S ScottDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Emily R J LucasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Julian K ChristiansDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1797-0591

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2021-02853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is hypothesized that male fetuses are more vulnerable to in utero insults than females due to different growth strategies, and that the placenta contributes to these sex differences. We examined sex differences in the fetal and placental responses to maternal food restriction (∼60% of ad libitum) beginning mid-gestation (Day 11.5). To dissect the roles of chromosomal and gonadal sex, we used the Four Core Genotypes mouse model, which combines deletion of the testis-determining Sry gene from the Y chromosome and autosomal insertion of the Sry gene, such that XX gonadal males and XY gonadal females are produced in addition to XX females and XY males. Food restriction reduced fetal and placental weights but had no effect on the number of viable conceptuses. However, this effect did not differ between gonadal male and female, or between XX and XY, conceptuses. Sex differences in gene expression in both the labyrinth and the combined junctional zone/decidua, as assessed by RNA sequencing, were due entirely to chromosomal sex and not gonadal sex. Food restriction affected the expression of 525 and 665 genes in the labyrinth and the junctional zone/decidua, respectively. However, these effects of food restriction did not differ by gonadal or chromosomal sex when assessed for statistical interactions. In contrast, when analyzing XX and XY placentas separately, hundreds of genes were affected by food restriction in one sex but not in the other, including hundreds of genes not found to be significant in the combined analyses. However, estimated effect sizes were generally similar for XX and XY placentas, suggesting that these sex-stratified analyses greatly exaggerated the extent of sex-dependent responses. Overall, we did not find evidence of the hypothesized sex differences in fetal growth strategy and found that sex differences in placental gene expression were largely due to chromosomal sex.

Indexed as

FetusPlacentaAnimalsFemaleFetal DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGonadsMaleMicePregnancySex-Determining Region Y ProteinSex-Determining Region Y Proteindeciduajunctional zonelabyrinthmalnutritionplacentaRNA sequencingsex differencestranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40286295
PMCPMC12085225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.