ArticleMolecular human reproduction2025
Roles of chromosomal and gonadal sex in the fetal and placental responses to maternal food restriction in mice.
Article in Molecular human reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is hypothesized that male fetuses are more vulnerable to in utero insults than females due to different growth strategies, and that the placenta contributes to these sex differences. We examined sex differences in the fetal and placental responses to maternal food restriction (∼60% of ad libitum) beginning mid-gestation (Day 11.5). To dissect the roles of chromosomal and gonadal sex, we used the Four Core Genotypes mouse model, which combines deletion of the testis-determining Sry gene from the Y chromosome and autosomal insertion of the Sry gene, such that XX gonadal males and XY gonadal females are produced in addition to XX females and XY males. Food restriction reduced fetal and placental weights but had no effect on the number of viable conceptuses. However, this effect did not differ between gonadal male and female, or between XX and XY, conceptuses. Sex differences in gene expression in both the labyrinth and the combined junctional zone/decidua, as assessed by RNA sequencing, were due entirely to chromosomal sex and not gonadal sex. Food restriction affected the expression of 525 and 665 genes in the labyrinth and the junctional zone/decidua, respectively. However, these effects of food restriction did not differ by gonadal or chromosomal sex when assessed for statistical interactions. In contrast, when analyzing XX and XY placentas separately, hundreds of genes were affected by food restriction in one sex but not in the other, including hundreds of genes not found to be significant in the combined analyses. However, estimated effect sizes were generally similar for XX and XY placentas, suggesting that these sex-stratified analyses greatly exaggerated the extent of sex-dependent responses. Overall, we did not find evidence of the hypothesized sex differences in fetal growth strategy and found that sex differences in placental gene expression were largely due to chromosomal sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.