Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40286276›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025

The Congregational Care Network: Preliminary Data From a Healthcare/Congregational Partnership for At-Risk Older Adults.

John D Foster, Alexia M Torke, Deanna R Willis, Shadreck W Kamwendo, James E Slaven, Brownsyne Tucker-Edmonds, Erika R Cheng, Tricia Behringer, Notoshia Howard, Sherri Session

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John D FosterIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Alexia M TorkeIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Deanna R WillisIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Shadreck W KamwendoIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
James E SlavenDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Brownsyne Tucker-EdmondsIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Erika R ChengIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Tricia BehringerIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Notoshia HowardIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sherri SessionIndiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

Understanding the needs and experiences of surrogate decision makers caring for SGM individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.K24AG053794 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TORKE, ALEXIA MARY · 2016 to 2025
$1.8M
Indiana University HealthNIA NIH HHS K24 AG053794NIA NIH HHS K24AG053794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial isolation and loneliness are significant public health crises that can exacerbate stress and diminish health behaviors, leading to overall reductions in well-being. The effects of systemic upstream social determinants of health (SDOH) can worsen these effects. Partnerships between communities of faith and health systems have the potential to reduce social isolation and loneliness, address unmet social needs, and improve access to healthcare.

methodsThe Congregational Care Network (CCN), a collaboration between a health system and local congregations in neighborhoods with high poverty and gaps in other SDOH, provided 1 h per week of individual, volunteer companionship to older adult patients for 90 days. The health system provided training and professional support from social workers and chaplains. A program evaluation measured loneliness before and after participation and healthcare utilization in the 90 days before, during, and after the program.

resultsCCN recruited 28 congregations representing diverse religious affiliations and 335 patients participated in the CCN program. Patients who received CCN services had a median age of 64.9 years (standard deviation 11.5), were 27.2% male, and 58.8% Black. There were significant reductions in DeJong Gierveld loneliness scores from before to after program engagement (median change score: 1 (interquartile range (IQR) 0-2, p < 0.001)). The proportion with 1+ emergency department visits was significantly lower after CCN compared to before (16.8% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.007); the proportion with inpatient visits was lower during CCN compared to before (12.2% vs. 17.3% vs. p = 0.032). The proportion with outpatient visits was higher during CCN than before (71.0% vs. 63.8%, p = 0.045).

conclusionThe CCN partnership between congregations and a local health system is a feasible model for at-risk older adults that may reduce loneliness and shift healthcare utilization from acute to outpatient settings, providing greater continuity of care and fewer burdensome acute care visits.

Indexed as

LonelinessSocial IsolationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationSocial Determinants of Healthacute care utilizationchaplainscongregationslonelinesssocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID40286276
PMCPMC12353396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.