Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40286260›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analysis of Pharmaceutical Active Compounds in Complex Water Samples: Sample Filtration as an Option.

Sofia Silva, João Rodrigues, Vitor V Cardoso, Rui N Carneiro, Cristina M M Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sofia SilvaDireção de Laboratórios, Empresa Portuguesa das Águas Livres, S.A.-EPAL, 1800-031 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7091-9029
João RodriguesDepartment of Chemistry, CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8621-5410
Vitor V CardosoDireção de Laboratórios, Empresa Portuguesa das Águas Livres, S.A.-EPAL, 1800-031 Lisboa, Portugal.
Rui N CarneiroDireção de Laboratórios, Empresa Portuguesa das Águas Livres, S.A.-EPAL, 1800-031 Lisboa, Portugal.
Cristina M M AlmeidaiMed.UL, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6872-9127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sample pretreatment is one of the most important steps in guaranteeing the success of a chromatographic analysis. The selected methodology must ensure simultaneously that a sample is "clean" enough for analysis and that the target analytes are not removed in the process. This can be especially difficult when working with complex matrices such as natural waters and wastewater. For pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) analysis by solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), and due to the high level of organic matter in wastewater, the water samples are filtered consecutively through three filters, a paper filter, a glass microfiber filter of 1 µm, and a Nylon filter of 0.45 µm. This filtration allows the sample's passage through the SPE cartridge to be faster, and there is no cartridge clogging, allowing for greater efficiency in the adsorption process. The big question is whether the PhACs are eliminated during filtration, since they may be adsorbed to organic matter. This work aimed to determine if the best approach for quantifying PhACs in wastewater and surface waters would be to filter them prior or to perform SPE directly. Both approaches analyzed a total of 26 PhACs. Turbidity (TUR) and permanganate index (PI) were determined, and their values were high for samples with a high organic matter content. A statistical analysis was performed to determine the best approach to treat these water samples and whether any correlation existed between PhAC concentrations, PI, and TUR. The PhAC quantification shows a positive correlation with TUR and a negative correlation with PI for most of the target PhACs. However, there are not significantly different results for filtered and not-filtered wastewater samples.

Indexed as

FiltrationWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalChromatography, High Pressure LiquidPharmaceutical PreparationsSolid Phase ExtractionTandem Mass SpectrometryPharmaceutical PreparationsWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalfiltrationPhACspharmaceutical compoundspre-treatmentUPLC-MS/MSwastewater

Identifiers

PMID40286260
PMCPMC11990622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.