ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Analysis of Pharmaceutical Active Compounds in Complex Water Samples: Sample Filtration as an Option.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Emerging Organic Pollutants in Aquatic Environments Under the Omics-Based Framework: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Semi-continuous adsorption-biocatalysis systems using waste-derived biochar functionalized with laccase for diclofenac removal from wastewater.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sample pretreatment is one of the most important steps in guaranteeing the success of a chromatographic analysis. The selected methodology must ensure simultaneously that a sample is "clean" enough for analysis and that the target analytes are not removed in the process. This can be especially difficult when working with complex matrices such as natural waters and wastewater. For pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) analysis by solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), and due to the high level of organic matter in wastewater, the water samples are filtered consecutively through three filters, a paper filter, a glass microfiber filter of 1 µm, and a Nylon filter of 0.45 µm. This filtration allows the sample's passage through the SPE cartridge to be faster, and there is no cartridge clogging, allowing for greater efficiency in the adsorption process. The big question is whether the PhACs are eliminated during filtration, since they may be adsorbed to organic matter. This work aimed to determine if the best approach for quantifying PhACs in wastewater and surface waters would be to filter them prior or to perform SPE directly. Both approaches analyzed a total of 26 PhACs. Turbidity (TUR) and permanganate index (PI) were determined, and their values were high for samples with a high organic matter content. A statistical analysis was performed to determine the best approach to treat these water samples and whether any correlation existed between PhAC concentrations, PI, and TUR. The PhAC quantification shows a positive correlation with TUR and a negative correlation with PI for most of the target PhACs. However, there are not significantly different results for filtered and not-filtered wastewater samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.