Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40286244›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Developing a Multi-Method Approach for Understanding Cellular Uptake and Biological Response: Investigating Co-Exposure of Macrophage-like Differentiated THP-1 Cells to Al

Yves Uwe Hachenberger, Benjamin Christoph Krause, Fabian Lukas Kriegel, Philipp Reichardt, Jutta Tentschert, Harald Jungnickel, Frank Stefan Bierkandt, Peter Laux, Ulrich Panne, Andreas Luch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yves Uwe HachenbergerDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-5053
Benjamin Christoph KrauseDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4684-2206
Fabian Lukas KriegelDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1536-2840
Philipp ReichardtDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0159-5814
Jutta TentschertDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4603-7293
Harald JungnickelDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1854-5354
Frank Stefan BierkandtDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-1536
Peter LauxDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0351-3392
Ulrich PanneFederal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Richard-Willstätter-Strasse 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6044-4998
Andreas LuchDepartment of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-901X

Funding

European Union 720952Federal Institute for Risk Assessment 1322-723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of different nanoparticles (NPs) is increasing in a wide variety of everyday products. Nevertheless, most studies concerning NP risk assessment have evaluated exposure scenarios involving a single kind of NP. A stepwise study distinguishing between the effects resulting from exposure to one kind of NP and those resulting from different co-exposure scenarios to Al2O3 and CeO2 NPs at concentrations below acute toxicity was conducted with different analytical techniques. As a starting point, WST-1 viability assays were performed to assess whether the chosen exposure concentrations resulted in any acute loss of viability, which would hamper further insight into the cellular response to NP exposure. Then, data on NP dissolution and uptake were obtained via single-particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (spICP-MS) and microwave-assisted ICP-MS. Additionally, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) was performed to check for differences in the biological response to the exposure scenarios at the single-cell level. It was found that the proposed combined techniques provide insight into changes in biological responses as well as cellular metal contents among the exposure scenarios. In this work, a comprehensive tiered analytical strategy for evaluating the biological responses to challenging exposure scenarios is provided. The results highlight the necessity of selecting situations more closely resembling real life-including concentrations below acute toxicity and potential interactions due to multiple NPs-when estimating potential health risks. These findings thus provide a foundation and an incentive for further research into the complex processes leading to the observed effects.

Indexed as

Aluminum OxideCeriumMacrophagesMetal NanoparticlesNanoparticlesCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalHumansTHP-1 CellsAluminum Oxideceric oxideCeriumco-expositionICP-MSnanoToF-SIMSviability changes

Identifiers

PMID40286244
PMCPMC11990466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.