ReviewPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2025
An Integrated Review of Findings from the Early Head Start University Partnerships Buffering Toxic Stress Consortium.
Review in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces the special issue of Prevention Science titled Applied Prevention Science to Inform Parenting Enhancements to Early Head Start that Promote Supportive Parent-Child Interactions and Buffer the Detrimental Effects of Early Adversity. We provide an integrative overview of the Early Head Start-University Partnerships Buffering Toxic Stress (BTS) consortium, funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), summarizing key findings from six studies and reflecting on their implications in light of recent ACF and Office of Head Start (OHS) policies and regulations. Programs such as Early Head Start (EHS), which integrate parenting support and skill-building, have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing parental competencies, reducing stress, and improving child outcomes. However, intervention effects remain modest and vary significantly by factors such as race and ethnicity, demographic risk, and family characteristics. This variability underscores the need for tailored, culturally responsive approaches that validate and refine frameworks for understanding parental and social buffering of children's toxic stress response. Findings from the BTS studies highlight promising program impacts, especially for families facing heightened risk, such as those with maternal histories of adverse childhood experiences or ongoing mental health challenges. This synthesis reinforces the importance of precision-based, contextually responsive interventions and aligns with recent ACF and OHS regulations aimed at developing scalable, cost-effective models that meet the unique needs of families experiencing adversity. Beyond EHS, we hope this special issue advances the field of applied prevention science by informing the development of tailored, effective, and sustainable programming for children and families navigating early adversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.