Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285960›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2025

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Spiritual Self-care Scale for Iranian Adolescents.

Nafiseh Hekmati-Pour, Gholam Reza Mahmoodi-Shan, Abbas Ebadi, Nasser Behnampour

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nafiseh Hekmati-PourAzad University of Aliabad Katool Branch, Ali Abad Katool, Golestan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0961-6533
Gholam Reza Mahmoodi-ShanNursing Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran. Mahmoodigh@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-8199
Abbas EbadiNursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-7005
Nasser BehnampourBiostatistics and Epidemiology Department, Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-8922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate a spiritual self-care tool for Iranian adolescents in 2019. The study utilized an exploratory mixed method approach, which included directed content analysis, item development, scale development, scale evaluation and examination of scale stability. During the qualitative phase, 170 items were initially extracted; these items were then reduced and refined to 59 items through scale development, content validity ratio and content validity index assessments. In terms of construct validity, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test yielded a value of 0.813 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was found to be significant (p < 0.001). Subsequently, the confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in a separate sample, resulting in a final model with 34 items and eight factors. The model demonstrated a moderate fit, with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.76 for the final version of the scale. As a result, the adolescents' spiritual self-care scale is considered a valid and reliable tool for measuring spiritual self-care.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSelf CareSpiritualityAdolescentFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansIranMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdolescent healthQuestionnaire designSpiritual self-care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.