ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Safety of bronchial artery infusion immunotherapy: from comparative analysis in beagle canines to clinical validation.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bronchial artery infusion of PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy improves progression-free survival in advanced NSCLC: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Bronchial Artery Infusion/Chemoembolization Combined with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and PD-1 Inhibitor in Initially Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite advancements in systemic chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to exhibit poor prognosis, underscoring an urgent need for safer and more effective therapeutic strategies. This study investigates the safety profile and biological effects of bronchial arterial infusion (BAI)-administered anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (aPD-1 mAb) using a preclinical beagle model and a clinical cohort of advanced NSCLC patients.
methodsIn preclinical evaluations, male beagles (n = 3/group) were randomized to receive 5 mg/kg aPD-1 mAb via BAI or intravenous routes (Venous group). Safety assessments included longitudinal imaging, biochemical analyses, and histopathological evaluation. Clinically, patients with advanced NSCLC meeting stringent inclusion criteria underwent BAI immunotherapy, with systematic monitoring of adverse events (AEs).
resultsBoth administration routes demonstrated comparable safety in canines, with no evidence of immune-related pneumonitis or structural lung alterations on CT or histology. Transient AEs (e.g., hematoma, lameness) resolved spontaneously. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed similar systemic drug concentrations and tissue distribution between BAI and Venous groups (all p > 0.05). Biochemical profiling identified isolated mild LDH elevation in one BAI-treated canine. Notably, the BAI group exhibited significantly enhanced systemic IL-2 levels (80.15 ± 5.24 pg/mL vs. 66.47 ± 5.24 pg/mL in Venous groups, p = 0.001) at day 28, paralleled by elevated pulmonary IL-2 expression (626.90 ± 18.49 vs. 559.18 ± 45.61 pg/mg, p = 0.03). In the clinical cohort (n = 17; 94.1% male, mean age 61.6 ± 7.1 years), BAI immunotherapy was well-tolerated with mild AEs including nausea (n = 1), dyspnea (n = 1), atrial fibrillation (n = 1), and puncture-site hematoma (n = 1). No severe immune-related toxicities (e.g., pneumonitis) emerged during follow-up.
conclusionOur study suggest the preliminary safety and feasibility of delivering aPD-1 mAb via BAI in both canine models and NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.