Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285921›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 - metastatic breast cancer-a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study.

Rachel Starkings, Helena Harder, Lesley Fallowfield, Valerie Shilling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Oncology's ongoing struggle with evaluating quality of life limiting, treatment-related toxicity.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel StarkingsSHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. R.M.L.Starkings@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-018X
Helena HarderSHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-8227
Lesley FallowfieldSHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-4518
Valerie ShillingSHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-0321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe IMPACTOR study (IMPact of AbemaCiclib on patienTs' rOles and Responsibilities-ISRCTN17281696) was developed to capture experiences of women with MBC being treated with abemaciclib in a real-world setting. The primary aim was to explore changes to quality of life over time and our secondary aim was to understand these changes in detail via qualitative interviews, as presented here.

methodsA singular interview was offered to participants who had expressed an interest at the point of consent. These were all conducted remotely using a semi-structured interview topic guide.

resultsTwenty interviews were completed and analysed using a framework approach to thematic analysis. Eight themes were developed-COVID-19, experience of MBC, side effects, side effect management, treatment information and support, relationship impacts, impact on daily life, and finances and employment.

conclusionsIt was apparent that participants faced side effects from treatment but undertook steps to manage these as much as possible. Adaptations were often led by a belief about the benefits of remaining on treatment. Adjustments ranged from modifying routines to carrying personal hygiene supplies when out in public in case of diarrhoea. While this was anticipated, other side effects were less well known with variable clinical support and available information. Family support was raised frequently, predominantly in relation to the impact MBC had on roles and relationships. Themes from this work can be thought of via theories about treatment belief and adherence, such as the common-sense and self-regulation models, as participants reflected on both emotional and cognitive coping strategies. Trial registration - ISRCTN17281696.

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesBreast NeoplasmsAdultAgedCOVID-19Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeabemaciclibAminopyridinesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAbemaciclibCopingDiarrhoea managementMetastatic breast cancerQualitativeSide effects

Identifiers

PMID40285921
PMCPMC12033103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.