ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2025
Effects of chicken and pig manures application on heavy metal in different soil types and on bacterial in the rhizosphere soil of Chinese cabbage.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metagenomic analysis of fecal and environmental microbiota in rural mixed livestock farming systems in South Africa.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In China, due to the rapid growth of the livestock and poultry farming industries, large amounts of manure are produced every year, which contains large amounts of heavy metals, and field application of this manure as fertilizer leads to the accumulation of heavy metals (HMs) in soils. In this study, a pot experiment and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were used to study the soil chemical properties and bacterial community characteristics of the Chinese cabbage rhizosphere in purple soil, red soil and yellow soil under fertilizer (CF), chicken manure (CM) and pig manure (PM) application. Compared with the CK and CF, chicken manure (CM3 and CM6) and pig manure (PM3 and PM6) application significantly increased the soil pH, soil organic matter (SOM), Cu and Zn contents, with greater increases at higher application rates. There were no significant changes in the total and available Cd and Pb contents in purple soil, but the contents of these heavy metals significantly decreased in red soil and yellow soils. The application of fertilizer increased the Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb contents in the shoots of Chinese cabbage, while the trends of heavy metals contents differed by soil type and manure type under other treatments. PERMANOVA revealed that the application of chicken manure and pig manure significantly affected the bacterial community structure of the cabbage rhizosphere soil regardless of soil type (P = 0.001). Network analysis revealed that application of chemical fertilizers enhanced network complexity, whereas the opposite was true for application of chicken and pig manure, and the relative abundance of Proteobacteria increased by 1.69% ~ 6.21%, 2.41% ~ 5.41% and 5.65% ~ 12.12%, respectively. Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that pH, SOM and Zn were the main factors affecting the bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil. The response of rhizosphere bacteria to different soil types differed. A correlation heatmap revealed that Lysobacter and Sphingomonas were heavy metal-resistant strains. The effects of Cu and Zn on bacteria in different rhizosphere soils were quite different. This study provides a reference for the safe application of livestock manure to agricultural fields, and the results suggest that heavy metal-resistant strains can be used to assist in the remediation of HM-polluted environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40285902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.