SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Assessing the impact of perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in spinal surgery: a comprehensive systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with transfusion and surgical site infection following paediatric scoliosis surgery: insights from a Latin American retrospective cohort.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Propensity score matching analysis of the relationship between allogeneic blood transfusion and postoperative pulmonary complications in scoliosis correction surgery: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of spinal surgeries, including decompression and fusion procedures, has increased significantly. Despite the potential benefits, these surgeries can result in substantial blood loss, requiring perioperative blood transfusions. However, transfusions can pose risks, such as infections and thromboembolic events. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between transfusion and non-transfusion groups in spinal surgery patients, focusing on infection rates, DVT, mortality, and other complications. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus from inception to April 1, 2024, yielding 15 studies involving a total of 60,920 patients. These studies focused on adult patients undergoing spinal surgery for conditions such as tumors, trauma, infection, or congenital diseases, comparing those who received blood transfusions (PRBC, FFP, platelets, and allogeneic blood transfusions) to those who did not. Eligible studies reported outcomes such as mortality, ischemic events, surgery duration, pulmonary embolism, surgical site infections (SSI), and urinary tract infections (UTI). Statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.3, applying a random-effects model. Outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous variables and standard differences in means for continuous outcomes. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I² statistics, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Results indicated no significant difference in surgery duration between transfusion and non-transfusion groups. However, patients receiving transfusions experienced longer hospital stays (SMD: 1.462, p = 0.021) and higher odds of complications (OR: 3.11, p < 0.001). Moreover, the transfusion group exhibited elevated odds of mortality (OR: 3.96, p < 0.001), ischemic events (OR: 3.527, p < 0.001), respiratory complications (OR: 4.18, p < 0.001), renal complications (OR: 2.43, p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR: 2.67, p = 0.012), deep vein thrombosis (OR: 2.737, p < 0.001), and thrombotic complications (OR: 5.232, p < 0.001). Additionally, the transfusion group had higher odds of surgical site infection (OR: 1.951, p < 0.001), while the non-transfusion group had decreased odds of urinary tract infection (OR: 2.960, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in respiratory tract infection (OR: 1.936, p = 0.09). Patients receiving blood transfusions had significantly higher odds of complications, including mortality, ischemic events, and thrombotic issues, as well as longer hospital stays. However, no significant difference was found in surgery duration between the transfusion and non-transfusion groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40285887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.