Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285887›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

Assessing the impact of perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in spinal surgery: a comprehensive systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.

Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Abdul Haseeb, Syed Muhammad Sinaan Ali, Muhammad Saqlain Mustafa, Aimen Naz, Furqanullah Khalid, Naeemullah Arbani, Syed Illyas Ahmed, Subash Perkash, Haya Waseem Ansari and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Factors associated with transfusion and surgical site infection following paediatric scoliosis surgery: insights from a Latin American retrospective cohort.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Muhammad Ashir ShafiqueDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Rafiqui H J Shaheed Road, Karachi, 75510, Pakistan. ashirshafique109@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7420-1292
Abdul HaseebDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Rafiqui H J Shaheed Road, Karachi, 75510, Pakistan.
Syed Muhammad Sinaan AliDepartment of Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8653-7629
Muhammad Saqlain MustafaDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Rafiqui H J Shaheed Road, Karachi, 75510, Pakistan.
Aimen NazDepartment of Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7326-6751
Furqanullah KhalidDepartment of Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-8377
Naeemullah ArbaniDepartment of Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4206-3103
Syed Illyas AhmedDepartment of Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Subash PerkashDepartment of Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Haya Waseem AnsariDepartment of Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5976-2198
Javed IqbalDepartment of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Nauman S ChaudharyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of spinal surgeries, including decompression and fusion procedures, has increased significantly. Despite the potential benefits, these surgeries can result in substantial blood loss, requiring perioperative blood transfusions. However, transfusions can pose risks, such as infections and thromboembolic events. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between transfusion and non-transfusion groups in spinal surgery patients, focusing on infection rates, DVT, mortality, and other complications. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus from inception to April 1, 2024, yielding 15 studies involving a total of 60,920 patients. These studies focused on adult patients undergoing spinal surgery for conditions such as tumors, trauma, infection, or congenital diseases, comparing those who received blood transfusions (PRBC, FFP, platelets, and allogeneic blood transfusions) to those who did not. Eligible studies reported outcomes such as mortality, ischemic events, surgery duration, pulmonary embolism, surgical site infections (SSI), and urinary tract infections (UTI). Statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.3, applying a random-effects model. Outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous variables and standard differences in means for continuous outcomes. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I² statistics, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Results indicated no significant difference in surgery duration between transfusion and non-transfusion groups. However, patients receiving transfusions experienced longer hospital stays (SMD: 1.462, p = 0.021) and higher odds of complications (OR: 3.11, p < 0.001). Moreover, the transfusion group exhibited elevated odds of mortality (OR: 3.96, p < 0.001), ischemic events (OR: 3.527, p < 0.001), respiratory complications (OR: 4.18, p < 0.001), renal complications (OR: 2.43, p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR: 2.67, p = 0.012), deep vein thrombosis (OR: 2.737, p < 0.001), and thrombotic complications (OR: 5.232, p < 0.001). Additionally, the transfusion group had higher odds of surgical site infection (OR: 1.951, p < 0.001), while the non-transfusion group had decreased odds of urinary tract infection (OR: 2.960, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in respiratory tract infection (OR: 1.936, p = 0.09). Patients receiving blood transfusions had significantly higher odds of complications, including mortality, ischemic events, and thrombotic issues, as well as longer hospital stays. However, no significant difference was found in surgery duration between the transfusion and non-transfusion groups.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionPerioperative CareSpineBlood Loss, SurgicalHumansPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical Wound InfectionBlood transfusionComplicationsDeep vein thrombosisInfectionLength of stayMortalityPulmonary embolismRenal complicationsSpinal surgerySurgical site infection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.