SynthesisPediatric surgery international2025
Pelvic floor physical therapy for functional constipation in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Shenqu Xiaoshi Oral Liquid for Functional Constipation in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Efficacy of pelvic floor rehabilitation and TENS in pediatric patients with refractory functional constipation: a randomized controlled study.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional constipation is a prevalent pediatric condition and affects the physical and psychological well-being of children. Pelvic floor physical therapy is an emerging approach to manage pelvic floor dysfunction and constipation. This review aimed to evaluate current evidence regarding the effects of pelvic floor physical therapy in children with functional constipation. Three bibliographic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched from inception to April 1, 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of pelvic floor physical therapy to conventional treatment were eligible for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the effects of different pelvic floor physical therapy treatment approaches. Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included, with 997 children with functional constipation. All included studies were scored four to eight on the PEDro scale, indicating fair to good quality. No adverse events related to pelvic floor physical therapy were reported. Biofeedback demonstrated no significant differences compared to control (RR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.50-1.68, p = 0.01). Other treatment approaches of pelvic floor physical therapy demonstrated some positive outcomes, including therapeutic exercise, manual therapy, electrical stimulation, and multimodal treatment. Compared to conventional treatment, these treatments demonstrated significantly increased defecation frequency (MD: 1.89, 95% CI 1.30-2.47, p < 0.001), reduced painful defecation (RR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.89, p = 0.004), enhanced quality of life (SMD: 1.14, 95% CI 0.26-2.01, p = 0.01), and reduced fecal incontinence (RR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.74, p < 0.001). Pelvic floor physical therapy is feasible and effective in mitigating symptoms and improving the quality of life for children with functional constipation. Medical providers may consider pelvic floor physical therapy as an adjunctive intervention for children with functional constipation to advance the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40285877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.