ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Alterations in muscular control when performing unfamiliar elbow flexion and extension movements.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age-related differences in muscular coordination while performing elbow flexion and extension movements at different velocities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis work analyzes how the Central Nervous System (CNS) adapts its control strategies-muscle synergies and muscular coactivation-during unfamiliar elbow flexion/extension tasks at different velocities.
methodsTwenty healthy participants (10 male; 10 female; age 31 ± 10,2 years) were recruited. Muscular activation of the biceps brachii, brachioradialis, and triceps brachii was recorded using surface electromyography. Elbow movements were tracked using a motion-capture system and an upper body biomechanical model. To represent an unfamiliar task, participants performed the movement in the transverse plane, while the familiar task was performed in the sagittal plane to allow for comparison. Movements were executed at different angular velocities to assess their effect. Muscle synergies were identified using the Non-Negative Matrix Factorization method.
resultsThe results indicate that the CNS adapts to unfamiliar movements primarily by increasing muscular coactivation to control position and movement velocity (p < 0.001, comparing familiar versus unfamiliar tasks). In contrast, during familiar tasks, the CNS achieves the stability required for faster movements through a higher contribution of muscle synergies (p < 0.05, comparing slowest versus fastest velocity). The statistical results revealed no significant interaction between task familiarity and movement velocity, suggesting that the effect of task familiarity on muscular activation remains consistent across all angular velocities.
conclusionThis work provides valuable insights into how muscle synergies and muscular coactivation complement each other. For an unfamiliar elbow flexion/extension task, the CNS primarily adapts by increasing the activation of all muscles acting on the joint to control position and movement velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.