ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2025
Enhancing tumor control in liver metastases treated with SBRT: dosimetric predictors and clinical outcomes from a single-center analysis.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Innovative radiotherapy strategies in advanced colon cancer with oligometastasis: a case of online adaptive radiotherapy and lattice stereotactic re-irradiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Management of liver metastases secondary to thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review of current management and future directions.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver metastases, a hallmark of systemic disease, carry a poor prognosis despite advancements in systemic therapies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising local treatment, offering durable tumor control with minimal toxicity. However, the optimal dosimetric strategies to maximize outcomes remain an area of active investigation. This retrospective study evaluated 76 patients with 101 liver metastases treated with SBRT between November 2012 and June 2024. Dosimetric parameters were analyzed, including prescribed dose (PD) and dose metrics for planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV), with doses converted to equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2, α/β = 10). Tumor control probability (TCP) models and survival outcomes were assessed, with a focus on the prognostic impact of dosimetric and clinical factors. Median overall survival (OS) was 33 months, with 1-year and 3-year OS rates of 74.1% and 39.4%, respectively. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) was 82.5% at 12 months. PD emerged as the strongest independent predictor of local control, with an optimal threshold of 77.44 Gy EQD2 significantly improving 1-year FFLP rates (96.8% vs. 67.2%; p = 0.007). Advanced motion management techniques, including internal breath-hold (iBH) with image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), demonstrated superior local control outcomes. Predictive modeling confirmed PD as the most robust dosimetric metric, correlating with a high TCP and outperforming other dose metrics. Toxicity was minimal, with only 3.9% experiencing grade ≥ 3 adverse events. SBRT represents a highly effective and safe approach for liver metastases, with PD and advanced imaging emerging as pivotal determinants of tumor control. These findings underscore the importance of precise dosimetric planning and motion management in optimizing SBRT outcomes. This study provides a robust framework for personalized treatment strategies, contributing to the integration of SBRT as a cornerstone in the multidisciplinary management of liver metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.