ArticleEuropean radiology2025
MR imaging and cholangiography show suboptimal performance for diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging manifestations of malignancy in inflammatory bowel disease: patterns, pitfalls and pearls.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Imaging mimickers of cholangiocarcinoma in the extra-hepatic biliary tree: a pictorial review with diagnostic clues.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOur purpose was to evaluate the performance of MR imaging/cholangiography for ductal cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) diagnosis and to search for specific MR features of ductal CCA among primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 31 patients from a single center, each with a diagnosis of PSC, and suspicion of ductal CCA. Ductal CCA had been suspected during multidisciplinary team meetings when high-grade biliary stenosis was associated with focal thickening of the biliary wall. Two radiologists blinded to clinical information and imaging history independently reviewed patients' MR examinations using a standardized model created for this study. Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test were used to analyze the population's characteristics. Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test were used to compare associations of categorical variables (each standard model's item) with the final diagnosis. Interobserver agreement was assessed by Cohen's κ coefficient.
resultsOur population had a mean age of 42.7 ± 13.6 years and included 68% males. The final diagnosis was ductal CCA for 14 patients, and inflammatory stenosis for 17 patients. For diagnosing CCA, MR imaging/cholangiography exhibited a sensitivity of 43-50% and specificity of 70-76%, with low positive predictive (58-60%) and negative predictive (62-63%) values. Interobserver agreement ranged from κ = 0.04-0.75. Univariate analysis revealed no significant association between individual MR imaging/cholangiography features and CCA diagnosis.
conclusionMR imaging/cholangiography showed suboptimal performance for ductal CCA diagnosis among PSC patients and we did not find any specific feature to distinguish ductal CCA from inflammatory stenosis. KEY POINTS: Question Diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis remains challenging without known predictive MR imaging features. Findings MR imaging/cholangiography exhibited low sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability for ductal cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis and lacks reliability for distinguishing between benign and malignant strictures. Clinical relevance Diagnosing ductal cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis remains challenging and our retrospective study demonstrates that MR imaging lacks reliability in distinguishing between benign and malignant high-grade strictures and did not find any specific MR feature of ductal CCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40285814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.