Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285812›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026

Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden.

Kaisa Fritzell, Johanna Wangmar, Berith Hedberg, Anke Woudstra, Anna Forsberg, Anders Kottorp, Karl A Franklin, Anna Jervaeus

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05512260 (Towards High, Equal and Informed Participation in Swedish Cancer Screening - the BESTa Project.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05512260 nawithdrawnnot on this map

Towards High, Equal and Informed Participation in Swedish Cancer Screening - the BESTa Project.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2023 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsNeoplasm, Colorectal, Neoplasm, Breast, Neoplasm, OvarianArmsIndividual decision aid (iDA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaisa FritzellDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 52, Huddinge, Sweden.
Johanna WangmarDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 52, Huddinge, Sweden.
Berith HedbergSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Anke WoudstraTeam Advies en Onderzoek, Municipal Health Service (GGD) Kennemerland, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
Anna ForsbergDepartment of Medicine Solna, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders KottorpFaculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Karl A FranklinDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anna JervaeusDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 52, Huddinge, Sweden. anna.jervaeus@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-8142

Funding

Cancerfonden 22 0598 FE 01 HCancerfonden FE PreventionRegional Cancer Centres Dnr VKN 2020-0212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A digital decision aid for cancer screening can gather balanced information in one place and give individuals the opportunity to elucidate their knowledge, values and engage in shared decision-making. Research shows that ethnic minorities and individuals with various functional limitations participate in cancer screening to a lower extent, hence our ambition to make the decision aid as available and applicable as possible, regardless of end-users' traits. The aim was to describe the design and alpha phases of the development of a digital decision aid for CRC screening and tentative end-users' perceptions. Based on a scientific framework for development of decision aids, participants were recruited through multiple channels. The decision aid was evaluated in two steps, a paper version (design phase) and a website prototype (alpha phase), using the think-aloud approach. Data were rich with detailed suggestions for improvements of the decision aid and how it was perceived. A positive outlook on the decision aid was common. Certain words, wordings or visual features were considered difficult and worry or anxiety, related to the content, were expressed. The variation in the findings illustrates the challenges of decision aid development. Still, our findings emphasise the importance of designing a decision aid in co-creation with its end-users. Developing a digital decision aid is complex, why a well-established framework is essential. With the goal of an equal healthcare system, the inclusion of individuals with diverse backgrounds and functional limitations should not only be a fundamental aspect of all research, but a prerequisite.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSwedenDecision Making, SharedDecision support techniquesEarly detection of cancerHealth promotionPublic health

Identifiers

PMID40285812
PMCPMC12971877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.