ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Innovative nanoparticle strategies for treating oral cancers.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PEG-GE11-modified nanoplatform for co-delivery of cisplatin and plumbagin in targeted therapy of oral squamous cell carcinoma.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Cancer-associated fibroblasts as a target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: bridging mechanisms to therapy with drugs, adjuvants, and nanotechnology.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-driven synergy in cardio-oncology: enhancing tumor suppression and reducing cardiotoxicity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Nanomaterials for Theranostic Management of Oral Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Biosensing, Targeted Delivery, and Multimodal Synergistic Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional therapies for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), a serious worldwide health problem, are frequently constrained by inadequate targeting and serious side effects. Drug delivery systems (DDS) based on nanoparticles provide a possible substitute by improving drug stability, target accuracy, and lowering toxicity. By addressing issues like irregular vasculature and thick tumor matrices, these methods allow for more effective medication administration. For instance, the delivery of cisplatin via liposomes, as opposed to free drug formulations, results in a 40% improvement in tumor suppression. Likewise, compared to traditional techniques, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles can produce up to 2.3 times more intertumoral drug accumulation. These platforms have effectively administered natural substances like curcumin and chemotherapeutics like paclitaxel, enhancing therapeutic results while reducing adverse effects. Despite their promise, several types of nanoparticles have drawbacks. For example, PLGA nanoparticles have scaling issues because of their complicated production, whereas liposomes are quickly removed from circulation. In preclinical investigations, functionalized nanoparticles-like EGFR-targeted gold nanoparticles-improve selectivity and effectiveness by obtaining up to 90% receptor binding. By preferentially accumulating in tumors via the increased permeability and retention (EPR) effect, nanoparticles also improve immunotherapy and radiation. Mechanistically, they increase the death of cancer cells by causing DNA damage, interfering with cell division, and producing reactive oxygen species (ROS). There are still issues with toxicity (such as the buildup of metallic nanoparticles in the liver) and large-scale manufacturing. Nevertheless, developments in multifunctional platforms and stimuli-responsive nanoparticles show promise for getting over these obstacles. These developments open the door to more individualized and successful OSCC therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40285805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.