Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285805›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

Innovative nanoparticle strategies for treating oral cancers.

Shahryar Irannejadrankouhi, Hassan Mivehchi, Aisan Eskandari-Yaghbastlo, Seyedeh Tabasom Nejati, Sahand Emrahoglu, Mohammad Nazarian, Farhad Zahedi, Seyed Mahdi Madani, Mohsen Nabi-Afjadi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shahryar IrannejadrankouhiFaculty of Dentistry, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Hassan MivehchiFaculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Aisan Eskandari-YaghbastloSchool of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, USA.
Seyedeh Tabasom NejatiSchool of Dentistry, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Sahand EmrahogluSchool of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mohammad NazarianFaculty of Dentistry, Belarusion State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus.
Farhad ZahediInstitute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, 91 Chieftan Way, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Seyed Mahdi MadaniFaculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Seyedmahdimadani@yahoo.com.
Mohsen Nabi-AfjadiDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran. mohsen.nabiafjadi@modares.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional therapies for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), a serious worldwide health problem, are frequently constrained by inadequate targeting and serious side effects. Drug delivery systems (DDS) based on nanoparticles provide a possible substitute by improving drug stability, target accuracy, and lowering toxicity. By addressing issues like irregular vasculature and thick tumor matrices, these methods allow for more effective medication administration. For instance, the delivery of cisplatin via liposomes, as opposed to free drug formulations, results in a 40% improvement in tumor suppression. Likewise, compared to traditional techniques, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles can produce up to 2.3 times more intertumoral drug accumulation. These platforms have effectively administered natural substances like curcumin and chemotherapeutics like paclitaxel, enhancing therapeutic results while reducing adverse effects. Despite their promise, several types of nanoparticles have drawbacks. For example, PLGA nanoparticles have scaling issues because of their complicated production, whereas liposomes are quickly removed from circulation. In preclinical investigations, functionalized nanoparticles-like EGFR-targeted gold nanoparticles-improve selectivity and effectiveness by obtaining up to 90% receptor binding. By preferentially accumulating in tumors via the increased permeability and retention (EPR) effect, nanoparticles also improve immunotherapy and radiation. Mechanistically, they increase the death of cancer cells by causing DNA damage, interfering with cell division, and producing reactive oxygen species (ROS). There are still issues with toxicity (such as the buildup of metallic nanoparticles in the liver) and large-scale manufacturing. Nevertheless, developments in multifunctional platforms and stimuli-responsive nanoparticles show promise for getting over these obstacles. These developments open the door to more individualized and successful OSCC therapies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDrug Delivery SystemsMouth NeoplasmsNanoparticle Drug Delivery SystemNanoparticlesAnimalsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsNanoparticle Drug Delivery SystemDrug deliveryNanoparticlesOral cancerTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.