Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285800›Full record

ReviewActa neuropathologica2025

Liquid biopsies for the monitoring of gliomas and brain metastases in adults.

Govert Dwarshuis, Lente L Kroon, Dieta Brandsma, David P Noske, Myron G Best, Nik Sol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neuropathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Govert Dwarshuis *Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lente L Kroon *Department of Neurology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dieta BrandsmaDepartment of Neurology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David P NoskeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Myron G BestDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nik SolDepartment of Neurology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.sol@nki.nl.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 14642KWF Kankerbestrijding 14739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical evaluation and MR imaging are currently the cornerstone of brain tumor progression monitoring. However, this is complicated by the occurrence of treatment effects such as pseudoprogression and radionecrosis. While essential for patient management, the distinction from true progression remains a significant challenge. Moreover, MR imaging provides limited real-time insights into tumor heterogeneity, genetic divergence, and treatment resistance. Although surgical histopathological biopsies can yield additional valuable information, they are not always conclusive, invasive, and therefore, not suitable for longitudinal measurements. In the era of precision medicine, there is a critical need for minimally invasive, accurate, and cost-effective monitoring methods for both primary brain tumors and brain metastases. Liquid biopsies have emerged as a potential candidate. Various analytes, including circulating nucleic acids, extracellular vesicles, platelet RNAs, and circulating tumor cells, can be obtained from whole blood and its derivatives, as well as other body fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid. In this narrative review, we outline the potential of liquid biopsies for the management of gliomas and brain metastases in adults and emphasize their utility in monitoring disease progression and treatment response. We discuss the most studied biofluids and analytes, along with their respective advantages and downsides. Furthermore, we address key considerations for future research and biobanking to pave the way for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsGliomaAdultDisease ProgressionHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersBrain metastasesBrain tumorsGliomaLiquid biopsyMonitoring

Identifiers

PMID40285800
PMCPMC12033197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.