ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
The value of deep learning and radiomics models in predicting preoperative serosal invasion in gastric cancer: a dual-center study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo establish and validate a model based on deep learning (DL), integrating radiomic features with relevant clinical features to generate nomogram, for predicting preoperative serosal invasion in gastric cancer (GC).
methodsThis retrospective study included 335 patients from dual centers. T staging (T1-3 or T4) was used to assess serosal invasion. Radiomic features were extracted from primary GC lesions in the venous phase CT, and DL features from 8 transfer learning models were combined to create the Hand-crafted Radiomics and Deep Learning Radiomics (HCR-DLR) model. The Clinical (CL) model was built using clinical features, and both were combined into the Clinical and Radiomics Combined (CRC) model. In total, 15 predictive models were developed using 5 machine learning algorithms. The best-performing models were visualized as nomograms.
resultsThe total of 14 radiomic features, 13 DL features, and 2 clinical features were considered valuable through dimensionality reduction and selection. Among the constructed models: CRC model (AUC, training cohort: 0.9212; internal test cohort: 0.8743; external test cohort: 0.8853) than HCR-DLR model (AUC, training cohort: 0.8607; internal test cohort: 0.8543; external test cohort: 0.8824) and CL model (AUC, training cohort: 0.7632; internal test cohort: 0.7219; external test cohort: 0.7294) showed better performance. A nomogram based on the logistic CL model was drawn to facilitate the usage and showed its excellent predictive performance.
conclusionThe predictive performance of the CRC Model, which integrates clinical features, radiomic features, and DL features, exhibits robust predictive capability and can serve as a simple, non-invasive, and practical tool for predicting the serosal invasion status of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40285792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.