Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285693›Full record

GuidelineInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

FIGO position statement on the use of the WHO labor care guide versus the partograph.

Akaninyene E Ubom, Albaro J Nieto-Calvache, Zechariah J Malel, Inês Nunes, FIGO Committee on Childbirth and PPH

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. FIGO position statement on the use of the WHO labor care guide versus the partograph.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akaninyene E UbomDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Albaro J Nieto-CalvacheDepartamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Zechariah J MalelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Juba, Juba, South Sudan.
Inês NunesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gaia/Espinho Local Health Unit, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-3916
FIGO Committee on Childbirth and PPH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The partograph, a graphical tool for recording labor events and assessing progress, was initially introduced by Dr. Emmanuel Friedman in 1954. Subsequent development by Philpott and Castle led to the widely adopted partograph in 1972. The World Health Organisation (WHO) endorsed its use in all labor wards in 1994, based on a multicenter trial demonstrating a significant reduction in prolonged labor, labor augmentation, emergency caesarean sections, and intrapartum stillbirths. In 2018, the WHO updated its global recommendations on intrapartum care, prompting a revision of the partograph. This resulted in the 2020 launch of the WHO Labor Care Guide (LCG), a supplementary monitoring tool. The LCG comprises seven sections, focusing on information at admission, supportive care, maternal and fetal care, labor progress, medication, and shared decision-making. Unlike the classic partograph, the LCG considers the active phase of labor to begin at a cervical dilatation of 5 cm. This evolution reflects ongoing efforts to improve maternal and fetal outcomes through evidence-based labor management. In this position statement FIGO recommends that the WHO LCG should be universally adopted and used to monitor labor in all settings to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality, and to support the implementation of the WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricLabor, ObstetricFemaleHumansPregnancyWorld Health Organizationlaborlabor care guidepartographWorld Health Organisation

Identifiers

PMID40285693
PMCPMC12177285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.