ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
Direct comparison of the structural dynamics between spontaneous and ligand-induced folding of staphylococcal nuclease.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Direct comparison of the structural dynamics between spontaneous and ligand-induced folding of staphylococcal nuclease.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite numerous studies focusing on the folding mechanism of globular proteins as well as ligand-induced folding of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), a unified framework for understanding both types of folding mechanisms has remained elusive. To explore the similarities and differences in the structural dynamics of spontaneous versus ligand-dependent folding, we investigated the folding dynamics of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) in the presence and absence of the substrate analog adenosine 3',5'-diphosphate (prAp). We employed equilibrium and kinetic measurements, using fluorescence and NMR spectroscopy, to study the folding of SNase coupled with the binding of prAp as a function of ligand and urea concentrations, including conditions favoring either conformational selection (CS; folding before binding) or induced fit (IF; binding before folding) scenarios. Our findings revealed that during ligand-induced folding under IF conditions, the N-terminal β-barrel domain is formed first, followed by the α-helical domain. In contrast, under CS conditions, the α-helical domain forms before the β-barrel domain. Additionally, the dynamics of ligand-induced folding mirrors the sequence of events encountered along the minor of the two parallel pathways governing the spontaneous folding process. Therefore, some of the apparent mechanistic differences between spontaneous versus ligand-induced folding can be attributed to the fact that interactions with a nucleotide ligand result in a shift in flux from the major to the minor folding pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.