ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Contrast Agent Clearance Dynamics and Diffusion in the Mouse Brain After Ventricular Administration.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo imaging of central nervous system fluid spaces using synchrotron radiation-based micro computed tomography.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Impact of infusion conditions and anesthesia on CSF tracer dynamics in mouse brain.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- In vivo imaging of the barrier properties of the glia limitans during health and neuroinflammation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Contrast Agent Clearance Dynamics and Diffusion in the Mouse Brain After Ventricular Administration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluid and solute exchange between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces and the central nervous system (CNS) parenchyma are critical for maintaining neural homeostasis and clearing metabolites. Nevertheless, the pathways and mechanisms underlying fluid and solute exchange between these compartments remain poorly understood. Historically, solute exchange between CSF spaces and the CNS parenchyma has been attributed to diffusion primarily driven by concentration gradients. Recently, the glymphatic hypothesis has challenged this concept by proposing that fluid and solutes move through the brain parenchyma via bulk flow, with influx along arterial perivascular spaces (PVS) and efflux along venous PVS. In this study, we used dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to investigate the distribution of two different contrast agents of molecular weights <1 kDa and 17 kDa injected into the lateral ventricle under awake, low-dose, and high-dose anesthesia conditions. Our findings revealed an increased CSF bulk flow of both contrast agents from the lateral ventricles to the circle of Willis under awake and low-dose anesthesia states. In contrast, solute movement into different regions of the brain parenchyma was size-dependent and affected by the rate of clearance from the ventricles. These observations support the CSF sink hypothesis, emphasizing diffusion-driven solute exchange as a key mechanism over glymphatic circulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.