ArticleJournal of food science2025
Predominant factors in milling and wheat variety influencing particle size and quality of whole wheat flour.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter-annual and regional variability of agronomic and grain quality traits of major Korean wheat cultivars under multi-environmental conditions.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- Crushing Mechanics and Flour Properties of Wheat Under Different Graded Crushing Durations in a Blade Crusher.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of Particle Size Control of Wheat Bran via Different Milling Techniques on the Structural and Physicochemical Properties of Arabinoxylan.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microstructure-informed stage characterization of wheat endosperm refinement during shear comminution.Current research in food science · 2026Article
- Effect ofInsects · 2025Article
- Suitability of Whole-Wheat Flours Milled Using Different Mills and Conditions for Dough- and Batter-Based Sweet Goods.Journal of food science · 2025Article
- Predominant factors in milling and wheat variety influencing particle size and quality of whole wheat flour.Journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of mill type, milling conditions, and wheat variety on the mean particle size, particle size distribution, and quality characteristics of whole wheat flour (WWFs). Three wheat varieties (Goso [GS], Hojoong [HJ], and Joongmo [JM]), representing varying protein contents, were milled using two types of mills: an ultra-centrifugal mill (UM) and a cutting mill (CM). The milling conditions were adjusted based on the sieve openings (0.5 and 1.0 mm) and rotor speeds (UM: 6000 and 14,000 rpm; CM: 2000 and 4000 rpm). The mean particle size and particle size distribution of the WWFs were significantly influenced by the mill type, milling conditions, and their interactions. UM and CM produced distinct particle size distributions, with CM yielding a broader range and a more pronounced bimodal distribution. Furthermore, the type of mill and milling conditions, along with their interactions, affected the damaged starch content, water and sodium carbonate solvent retention capacity, pasting properties, and antioxidant activity of the WWFs. The wheat variety influenced parameters such as moisture, ash, damaged starch content, sodium dodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, rapid viscoanalyzer (RVA) pasting properties, total phenolic content, and antioxidant activity. Notably, selecting an appropriate mill type and milling conditions is critical for producing WWFs with high gluten strength from high-protein wheat varieties. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Controlling particle size through milling optimization is essential for producing high-quality whole wheat flour, particularly from wheat varieties with high protein content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.