ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2026
Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Model as Complete Case Scenario in Undergraduate Dental Education-Diagnosis, Treatment Planning and Clinical Practice.
Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction3D-printed teeth/models are important adjuncts in dental education. Nevertheless, there is a lack of simulated cases to learn and understand complex treatment scenarios, including anamnesis, diagnosis, treatment planning and therapy. MATERIAL AND
methodsThird-year students (n = 44) received a complete 3D-printed model (upper and lower jaw) of a patient who needed emergency treatment. Based on the information provided (i) general history, (ii) specific dental history, (iii) radiographs, the students made a diagnosis and planned the treatment, which they performed independently under supervision. The case included periodontal, restorative, endodontic and surgical treatments and semi-permanent splinting. Using a 3- or 5-point Likert scale, students rated each treatment episode, the learning outcome and the impact of the model on training using a questionnaire. Chi-square test served for statistical analysis.
resultsThe majority (63.6%) stated that the interdisciplinary model allowed a better learning effect than the approach dealing with each section separately (p < 0.05). Almost all students rated the diagnostic process as excellent (88.0%-95.5%), as the general history, dental history and radiographs were consistent with the clinical findings. Periodontal therapy was rated significantly lower compared to all other areas (p < 0.05). For endodontic treatment, the students disagreed, abstaining from practising on extracted human teeth. However, the students felt confident to perform all treatment steps in the following clinical courses.
conclusionCustomised, interdisciplinary 3D-printed teaching models covering complex treatment strategies were best suited to enhance dental students' skills and foster their enthusiasm for the integrated diagnosis and treatment planning process. Their implementation into dental education is strongly recommended to improve both training and future patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.