ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Wearable Silent Text Input System Using EMG and Piezoelectric Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces a wearable silent text input system designed to capture text input through silent speech, without generating audible sound. The system integrates Electromyography (EMG) and piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) sensors in a miniaturized form that can be comfortably attached to the chin, making it both comfortable to wear and esthetically pleasing. The EMG sensor records muscle activity linked to specific tongue and jaw movements, while the PZT sensor measures the minute vibrations and pressure changes in the chin skin caused by silent speech. Data from both sensors are analyzed to capture the timing and intensity of the silent speech signals, allowing the extraction of key features in both time and frequency domain. Several machine learning (ML) models, including both feature-based and non-feature-based approaches commonly used for classification tasks, are employed and compared to detect and classify subtle variations in sensor signals associated with individual alphabet letters. To evaluate and compare the ML models, EMG and PZT signals for the eight most frequently used English letters are collected across one hundred trials each. Results showed that non-feature-based models, particularly the Fea-Shot Learning with fused EMG and PZT signals, achieved the highest accuracy (95.63%) and F1-score (95.62%). The proposed system's accuracy and real-time performance make it promising for silent text input and assistive communication applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.