ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhanced Prediction of Soil Carbon via Encoder-Decoder Neural Networks for a Boreal Study Area in Northern Ontario.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing the impacts of carbon in connection with land cover conversion and climate change is of predominant interest for boreal realms. Consequently, boosting accuracy for the prediction of total carbon (C) with soil mapping is a crucial objective, particularly for a boreal study area under risk of land cover transition in northern Ontario, Canada. To enhance the prediction of soil modeling, integrated approaches combining encoder-decoder (ED) with dense neural network (DNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) formulations suitable for smaller target data sets were developed. These methods were able to effectively extract dominant features within predictor data and augment modeling accuracy. The obtained results were compared with those attained from structural equation modeling (SEM) and random forest (RF), as well as basic DNN and CNN models. A model ensemble based on all approaches was also considered, from which standard deviations were calculated to gauge the prediction uncertainty. Quantile mappings with respect to deciles were also derived from the model ensemble to provide additional insights with prediction. Validation accuracies for the ED-CNN model attained a coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.