Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285269›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Speckle-Based Transmission and Dark-Field Imaging for Material Analysis with a Laboratory X-Ray Source.

Diego Rosich, Margarita Chevalier, Tatiana Alieva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego RosichPhysics Institute of Cantabria (IFCA-CSIC-UC), Av. de los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-6423-5135
Margarita ChevalierDepartment of Radiology, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Pl. de Ramón y Cajal s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-9783
Tatiana AlievaDepartment of Optics, Faculty of Physics, Complutense University of Madrid, Pl. de las Ciencias 1, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7638-9150

Funding

Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer Ayudas Predoctorales AECC 2023Comunidad de Madrid CT36/22-43-UCM-INVMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2021-123390OB-C21Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2021-123390OB-C22Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2021-125483NB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal imaging is valuable because it can provide additional information beyond that obtained from a conventional bright-field (BF) image and can be implemented with a widely available device. In this paper, we investigate the implementation of speckle-based transmission (T) and dark-field (DF) imaging in a laboratory X-ray setup to confirm its usefulness for material analysis. Three methods for recovering T and DF images were applied to a sample composed of six materials: plastic, nylon, cardboard, cork, expanded polystyrene and foam with different absorption and scattering properties. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and linear attenuation, absorption and diffusion coefficients obtained from BF, T and DF images are studied for two object-to-detector distances (ODDs). Two analysis windows are evaluated to determine the impact of noise on the image contrast of T and DF images and the ability to retrieve material characteristics. The unified modulated pattern analysis method proves to be the most reliable among the three studied speckle-based methods. The results showed that the CNR of T and DF images increases with larger analysis windows, while linear absorption and diffusion coefficients remain constant. The CNR of T images decreases with increasing ODD due to noise, whereas the CNR of DF images exhibits more complex behaviour, due to the material-dependent reduction in DF signal with increasing ODD. The experimental results on the ODD dependence of T and DF signals are consistent with recently reported numerical simulation results of these signals. The absorption coefficients derived from T images are largely independent of the ODD and the speckle-based method used, making them a universal parameter for material discrimination. In contrast, the linear diffusion coefficients vary with the ODD, limiting their applicability to specific experimental configurations despite their notable advantages in distinguishing materials. These findings highlight that T and DF images obtained from a laboratory X-ray setup offer complementary insights, enhancing their value for material analysis.

Indexed as

dark-field imaginglaboratory sourcematerial analysismultimodal X-ray imagingX-ray speckle-based imaging

Identifiers

PMID40285269
PMCPMC12030854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.