ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Speckle-Based Transmission and Dark-Field Imaging for Material Analysis with a Laboratory X-Ray Source.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal imaging is valuable because it can provide additional information beyond that obtained from a conventional bright-field (BF) image and can be implemented with a widely available device. In this paper, we investigate the implementation of speckle-based transmission (T) and dark-field (DF) imaging in a laboratory X-ray setup to confirm its usefulness for material analysis. Three methods for recovering T and DF images were applied to a sample composed of six materials: plastic, nylon, cardboard, cork, expanded polystyrene and foam with different absorption and scattering properties. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and linear attenuation, absorption and diffusion coefficients obtained from BF, T and DF images are studied for two object-to-detector distances (ODDs). Two analysis windows are evaluated to determine the impact of noise on the image contrast of T and DF images and the ability to retrieve material characteristics. The unified modulated pattern analysis method proves to be the most reliable among the three studied speckle-based methods. The results showed that the CNR of T and DF images increases with larger analysis windows, while linear absorption and diffusion coefficients remain constant. The CNR of T images decreases with increasing ODD due to noise, whereas the CNR of DF images exhibits more complex behaviour, due to the material-dependent reduction in DF signal with increasing ODD. The experimental results on the ODD dependence of T and DF signals are consistent with recently reported numerical simulation results of these signals. The absorption coefficients derived from T images are largely independent of the ODD and the speckle-based method used, making them a universal parameter for material discrimination. In contrast, the linear diffusion coefficients vary with the ODD, limiting their applicability to specific experimental configurations despite their notable advantages in distinguishing materials. These findings highlight that T and DF images obtained from a laboratory X-ray setup offer complementary insights, enhancing their value for material analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.