ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Breath-by-Breath Measurement of Respiratory Frequency and Tidal Volume with a Multiple-Camera Motion Capture System During Cycling Incremental Exercise.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of a 32-marker motion capture (MoCap) system in estimating respiratory frequency (fR) and tidal volume (VT) during cycling exercise. Fourteen well-trained cyclists performed an incremental step test on a cycle ergometer, while simultaneously recording a raw flow signal with a reference metabolic cart (COSMED) and respiratory-induced torso movements with twelve optoelectronic cameras registering the position of 32 markers affixed to the torso. fR and VT were calculated from both systems on a breath-by-breath basis. The MoCap system showed a strong correlation with the COSMED system when measuring fR and VT (r2 = 0.99, r2 = 0.87, respectively) during exercise. For fR, the mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were 0.79 breaths/min and 2.1%, respectively. For VT, MoCap consistently underestimated values compared to COSMED, showing a bias (MOD ± LOA) of -0.11 ± 0.42 L and MAPE values of 8%. These findings highlight the system's capabilities for real-time respiratory monitoring in athletic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.