ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Circle Detection with Adaptive Parameterization: A Bottom-Up Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circle detection remains a critical yet challenging task in computer vision, particularly under complex imaging conditions where existing measurement methods face persistent challenges in parameter configuration and noise resilience. This paper presents a novel circle detection algorithm based on two perceptually grounded parameters: the perceptual length difference resolution λ, derived from human cognitive models, and the minimum distinguishable distance threshold K, determined through empirical observations. The algorithm implements a local stochastic sampling strategy integrated with a bottom-up circular search mechanism, with all critical parameters in the algorithm derived adaptively based on λ and K, eliminating the need for repetitive hyperparameter search processes. Experiments demonstrate that our methodology achieves an exceptional Fscore of 85.5% on the public circle detection dataset, surpassing state-of-the-art approaches by approximately 7.3%. Notably, the framework maintains robust detection capability (Fscore = 85%) under extreme noise conditions (50% Gaussian noise contamination), maintaining superior performance relative to comparative methods. The adaptive parameterization strategy provides insights for developing vision systems that bridge computational efficiency with human perceptual robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.