ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Layer Prints in Direct Ink Writing Based on Machine Vision.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Printed Crack Detection Sensors for SHM Based on Direct Ink Write Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The absence of standardized evaluation methodologies for single-layer dimensional accuracy significantly hinders the broader implementation of direct ink writing (DIW) technology. Addressing the critical need for precision non-contact assessment in DIW fabrication, this study develops a novel machine vision-based framework for dimensional accuracy evaluation. The methodology encompasses three key phases: (1) establishment of an optimized hardware configuration with integrated image processing algorithms; (2) comprehensive investigation of camera calibration protocols, advanced image preprocessing techniques, and high-precision contour extraction methods; and (3) development of an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm-enhanced evaluation system. The experimental results demonstrate that our machine vision system achieves 0.04 mm × 0.04 mm spatial resolution with the ICP convergence threshold optimized to 0.001 mm. The proposed method shows an 80% improvement in measurement accuracy (0.001 mm) compared to conventional approaches. Process parameter optimization experiments validated the system's effectiveness, showing at least 76.3% enhancement in printed layer dimensional accuracy. This non-contact evaluation solution establishes a robust framework for quantitative quality control in DIW applications, providing critical insights for process optimization and standardization efforts in additive manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.