ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Semantic Fusion Algorithm of 2D LiDAR and Camera Based on Contour and Inverse Projection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight Semantic-Aware Route Planning on Edge Hardware for Indoor Mobile Robots: Monocular Camera-2D LiDAR Fusion with Penalty-Weighted Nav2 Route Server Replanning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Onboard LiDAR-Camera Deployment Optimization for Pavement Marking Distress Fusion Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Common single-line 2D LiDAR sensors and cameras have become core components in the field of robotic perception due to their low cost, compact size, and practicality. However, during the data fusion process, the randomness and complexity of real industrial scenes pose challenges. Traditional calibration methods for LiDAR and cameras often rely on precise targets and can accumulate errors, leading to significant limitations. Additionally, the semantic fusion of LiDAR and camera data typically requires extensive projection calculations, complex clustering algorithms, or sophisticated data fusion techniques, resulting in low real-time performance when handling large volumes of data points in dynamic environments. To address these issues, this paper proposes a semantic fusion algorithm for LiDAR and camera data based on contour and inverse projection. The method has two remarkable features: (1) Combined with the ellipse extraction algorithm of the arc support line segment, a LiDAR and camera calibration algorithm based on various regular shapes of an environmental target is proposed, which improves the adaptability of the calibration algorithm to the environment. (2) This paper proposes a semantic segmentation algorithm based on the inverse projection of target contours. It is specifically designed to be versatile and applicable to both linear and arc features, significantly broadening the range of features that can be utilized in various tasks. This flexibility is a key advantage, as it allows the method to adapt to a wider variety of real-world scenarios where both types of features are commonly encountered. Compared with existing LiDAR point cloud semantic segmentation methods, this algorithm eliminates the need for complex clustering algorithms, data fusion techniques, and extensive laser point reprojection calculations. When handling a large number of laser points, the proposed method requires only one or two inverse projections of the contour to filter the range of laser points that intersect with specific targets. This approach enhances both the accuracy of point cloud searches and the speed of semantic processing. Finally, the validity of the semantic fusion algorithm is proven by field experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.