ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Distributed Sensor Network Calibration Under Sensor Nonlinearities with Applications in Aerodynamic Pressure Sensing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The theoretical part of this paper is devoted to a class of distributed blind calibration algorithms for large sensor networks based on consensus. The basic blind calibration method starts from affine sensor models and calibration functions, aiming to equalize corrected sensor offsets and gains without requiring any a priori knowledge of the measured signal. The main focus is to systematically and rigorously analyze the behavior of the calibration algorithms of the stochastic approximation type under nonlinear sensor models and stochastic environments, and to provide recommendations that are relevant to practice. It is demonstrated that the calibration algorithm-based on consensus with respect to all the calibration parameters-is far less robust to unknown sensor nonlinearities than the modified algorithm, taking one micro-calibrated sensor as a reference. Stability proofs of the algorithms are given in the bounded input-bounded output sense. The influences of measurement and communication noises are also analyzed using the theory of stochastic approximation. Numerous simulation results provide a comprehensive picture of the algorithm properties that are relevant to practice. This is followed by an important verification of the theoretical results, obtained by applying the analyzed blind calibration algorithms to an originally designed multichannel instrument for aerodynamic pressure sensing. A description of the new instrument is given, together with essential aspects of the implementation of the blind calibration algorithm. It is shown that the selected algorithm can be seen as a simple and efficient practical tool for blind online real-time re-calibration of complex sensor networks during normal system operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.