ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Underwater Magnetic Sensors Network.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Two-Dimensional (2-D) Sensor Network Architecture with Artificial Intelligence Models for the Detection of Magnetic Anomalies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the design and performance of an underwater magnetic sensor network (UMSN) tailored for intrusion detection in complex environments such as riverbeds and areas with dense vegetation. The system utilizes wireless sensor network (WSN) principles and integrates AMR-based magnetic sensors (e.g., LSM303AGR) with MEMS-based accelerometers to provide accurate and high-resolution magnetic field measurements. Extensive calibration techniques were employed to correct hard-iron and soft-iron distortions, ensuring reliable performance in fluctuating environmental conditions. Field tests included both controlled setups and real-world scenarios, such as detecting intrusions across river sections, shorelines, and coordinated land-water activities. The results showed detection rates consistently above 90%, with response times averaging 2.5 s and a maximum detection range of 5 m. The system also performed well under adverse weather conditions, including fog and rain, demonstrating its adaptability. The findings underline the potential of UMSN as a scalable and cost-efficient solution for monitoring sensitive areas. By addressing the limitations of traditional surveillance systems, this research offers a practical framework for enhancing security in critical regions, laying the groundwork for future developments in magnetic sensor technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.