ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Computer Vision in Monitoring Fruit Browning: Neural Networks vs. Stochastic Modelling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As human labour is limited and therefore expensive, computer vision has emerged as a solution with encouraging results for monitoring and sorting tasks in the agrifood sector, where conventional methods for inspecting fruit browning that are generally subjective, time-consuming, and costly. Thus, this study investigated the application of computer vision techniques and various RGB cameras in the detection and classification of enzymatic browning in cut pears, comparing convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with stochastic modelling. More specifically, light is shed on the potential of CNN-based approaches for high-throughput and easily adapted applications and the potential of stochastic methods for precise, quantitative analyses. In particular, the developed CNN model was easily trained and achieved an accuracy of 96.6% and an F1-score greater than 0.96 during testing with real pear slices. On the other hand, stochastic modelling provided quantitative indices (i.e., the Browning Index (BI) and Yellowing Index (YI)) derived from the CIE Lab* colour model, thus offering accurate monitoring of enzymatic browning and related optical changes but it was less versatile as it required human expertise for implementation and tuning. Using both the BI and YI as input vectors in the NN Bayesian classifier increased the correct classification rate of control samples to 82.85% (4.6% increase) and to 89.81% (15% increase) for treated samples. Finally, a future need for a hybrid approach combining the strengths of both methods was identified, with improved robustness and practicality of image analysis systems in agricultural quality control to enable higher levels of automation in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.