Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285125›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluating Sensor Fusion and Flight Parameters for Enhanced Plant Height Measurement in Dry Peas.

Aliasghar Bazrafkan, Hannah Worral, Cristhian Perdigon, Peter G Oduor, Nonoy Bandillo, Paulo Flores

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aliasghar BazrafkanDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7862-0520
Hannah WorralDepartment of Plant Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-5815
Cristhian PerdigonDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Peter G OduorDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Disaster Resilience, and Emergency Management, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3111-3641
Nonoy BandilloDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Paulo FloresDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3964-6904

Funding

North Dakota Department of Agriculture 21-316 and 20-489USDA-NIFA ND01513 and ND01488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant height is an important trait for evaluating plant lodging, drought, and stress. Standard measurement techniques are expensive, laborious, and error-prone. Although UAS-based sensors and digital aerial photogrammetry have been tested on plants with an erect growth habit, further study is needed in the application of these technologies to prostrate crops such as dry peas. This study has compared the performance of LiDAR, RGB, and multispectral sensors across different flight configurations (altitudes, speeds), and image overlaps over dry pea plots to identify the optimal setup for accurate plant height estimation. Data were assessed to determine the effect of sensor fusion on plant height accuracy using LiDAR's digital terrain model (DTM) as the base layer, and digital surface models (DSMs) generated from RGB and multispectral sensors. All sensors, particularly RGB, tended to underestimate plant height at higher flight altitudes. However, RMSE and MAE values showed no significant difference, indicating that higher flight altitudes can reduce data collection time and cost without sacrificing accuracy. Multispectral and LiDAR sensors were more sensitive to changes in flight speed than RGB sensors; However, RMSE and MAE values did not vary significantly across the tested speeds. Increased image overlap resulted in improved accuracy across all sensors. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test showed no significant difference between sensor fusion and individual sensors. Although LiDAR provided the highest accuracy of dry peas height estimation, it was not consistent across all canopy structures. Therefore, future research should focus on the integrating machine learning models with LiDAR to improve plant height estimation in dry peas.

Indexed as

Remote Sensing TechnologyPhotogrammetrydigital aerial photogrammetryhigh-throughput phenotypingLiDARplant heightUAS

Identifiers

PMID40285125
PMCPMC12031086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.