ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating Sensor Fusion and Flight Parameters for Enhanced Plant Height Measurement in Dry Peas.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Prediction of Maize Tasseling Stage Based on UAV LiDAR Time-Series Plant Height Growth Curves: A Framework Coupling UAV-CHM-POI.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Non-destructive and accurate phenotypic detection method for okra seedlings under salt stress based on dual-view feature fusion and lightweight PointNet+.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant height is an important trait for evaluating plant lodging, drought, and stress. Standard measurement techniques are expensive, laborious, and error-prone. Although UAS-based sensors and digital aerial photogrammetry have been tested on plants with an erect growth habit, further study is needed in the application of these technologies to prostrate crops such as dry peas. This study has compared the performance of LiDAR, RGB, and multispectral sensors across different flight configurations (altitudes, speeds), and image overlaps over dry pea plots to identify the optimal setup for accurate plant height estimation. Data were assessed to determine the effect of sensor fusion on plant height accuracy using LiDAR's digital terrain model (DTM) as the base layer, and digital surface models (DSMs) generated from RGB and multispectral sensors. All sensors, particularly RGB, tended to underestimate plant height at higher flight altitudes. However, RMSE and MAE values showed no significant difference, indicating that higher flight altitudes can reduce data collection time and cost without sacrificing accuracy. Multispectral and LiDAR sensors were more sensitive to changes in flight speed than RGB sensors; However, RMSE and MAE values did not vary significantly across the tested speeds. Increased image overlap resulted in improved accuracy across all sensors. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test showed no significant difference between sensor fusion and individual sensors. Although LiDAR provided the highest accuracy of dry peas height estimation, it was not consistent across all canopy structures. Therefore, future research should focus on the integrating machine learning models with LiDAR to improve plant height estimation in dry peas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.