Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285106›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Assessing Vibrotactile Feedback Effects on Posture, Muscle Recruitment, and Cognitive Performance.

Demir Tuken, Ian Silva, Rachel V Vitali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Demir TukenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2539-4336
Ian SilvaDepartment of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Rachel V VitaliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1436-6148

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent among medical professionals like dentists, who often maintain prolonged, ergonomically disadvantageous postures. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a wearable sensor-based monitoring and feedback system designed to improve posture and evaluate muscle recruitment. Thirty-five healthy adults participated in a controlled experiment, performing a typing task under various postural conditions with and without haptic feedback. Surface electromyography sensors measured muscle activity in the upper trapezius and infraspinatus muscles, while inertial measurement units tracked spine orientation. The results indicated that haptic feedback significantly influenced muscle activity and posture. Feedback reduced deviations from the desired postures but increased muscle activity in certain conditions. Cognitive performance, measured by typing speed, decreased with feedback, suggesting a trade-off between maintaining posture and the performance of the task. These findings highlight the potential of haptic feedback in ergonomic interventions to mitigate MSDs. Future research should explore the long-term effects and optimize feedback mechanisms to balance posture correction and cognitive demands.

Indexed as

CognitionFeedback, SensoryMuscle, SkeletalPostureAdultElectromyographyErgonomicsFemaleHumansMaleTouchVibrationWearable Electronic DevicesYoung Adultcognitive performanceergonomicshaptic feedbackinertial measurement unitmuscle recruitmentmusculoskeletal disordersposturespinal orientationsurface electromyographywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID40285106
PMCPMC12031471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.