ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Tidal Volume Monitoring via Surface Motions of the Upper Body-A Pilot Study of an Artificial Intelligence Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Study on the Grip Force of Ski Gloves with Feature Data Fusion Based on GWO-BPNN Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The measurement of tidal volumes via respiratory-induced surface movements of the upper body has been an objective in medical diagnostics for decades, but a real breakthrough has not yet been achieved. The improvement of measurement technology through new, improved sensor systems and the use of artificial intelligence have given this field of research a new dynamic in recent years and opened up new possibilities. Based on the measurement from a motion capture system, the respiration-induced surface motions of 16 test subjects were examined, and specific motion parameters were calculated. Subsequently, linear regression and a tailored convolutional neural network (CNN) were used to determine tidal volumes from an optimal set of motion parameters. The results showed that the linear regression approach, after individual calibration, could be used in clinical applications for 13/16 subjects (mean absolute error < 150 mL), while the CNN approach achieved this accuracy in 5/16 subjects. Here, the individual subject-specific calibration provides significant advantages for the linear regression approach compared to the CNN, which does not require calibration. A larger dataset may allow for greater confidence in the outcomes of the CNN approach. A CNN model trained on a larger dataset would improve performance and may enable clinical use. However, the database of 16 subjects only allows for low-risk use in home care or sports. The CNN approach can currently be used to monitor respiration in home care or competitive sports, while it has the potential to be used in clinical applications if based on a larger dataset that could be gradually built up. Thus, a CNN could provide tidal volumes, the missing parameter in vital signs monitoring, without calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.