Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285087›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Optimizing Sensor Placement for Event Detection: A Case Study in Gaseous Chemical Detection.

Priscile Fogou Suawa, Christian Herglotz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priscile Fogou SuawaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0404-2043
Christian HerglotzDepartment of Computer Engineering, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 16ES1128K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In dynamic industrial environments, strategic sensor placement is key to accurately monitoring equipment and detecting critical events. Despite progress in Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things, research on optimal sensor placement remains limited. This study addresses this gap by analyzing how sensor placement impacts event detection, using chemical detection as a case study with an open dataset. Detecting gases is challenging due to their dispersion. Effective algorithms and well-planned sensor locations are required for reliable results. Using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) and decision tree (DT) methods, we implemented and tested detection models on a public dataset of chemical substances collected at five locations. In addition, we also implemented a multi-objective optimization approach based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to identify optimal sensor configurations that balance high detection accuracy with cost efficiency in sensor deployment. Using the refined sensor placement, the DCNN model achieved 100% accuracy using only 30% of the available sensors.

Indexed as

event detectiongaseous substancesindustrial monitoring applicationsinfluence of sensor locationmulti-objective optimizationsensorssensors fusionsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40285087
PMCPMC12031020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.