ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimizing Sensor Placement for Event Detection: A Case Study in Gaseous Chemical Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study on a Digital Twin Method for Modelling the Diffusion Process of Fault Gases Inside High-Voltage Switchgear Combining Virtual and Physical Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and sports genomics: advancing precision sports science and athletic performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In dynamic industrial environments, strategic sensor placement is key to accurately monitoring equipment and detecting critical events. Despite progress in Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things, research on optimal sensor placement remains limited. This study addresses this gap by analyzing how sensor placement impacts event detection, using chemical detection as a case study with an open dataset. Detecting gases is challenging due to their dispersion. Effective algorithms and well-planned sensor locations are required for reliable results. Using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) and decision tree (DT) methods, we implemented and tested detection models on a public dataset of chemical substances collected at five locations. In addition, we also implemented a multi-objective optimization approach based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to identify optimal sensor configurations that balance high detection accuracy with cost efficiency in sensor deployment. Using the refined sensor placement, the DCNN model achieved 100% accuracy using only 30% of the available sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.