Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285081›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

An Innovative Study for Tool Wear Prediction Based on Stacked Sparse Autoencoder and Ensemble Learning Strategy.

Zhaopeng He, Tielin Shi, Xu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhaopeng HeSchool of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Tielin ShiSchool of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6977-9700
Xu ChenSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Hubei 2023BAB096National Science Foundation of China 52375567National Science Foundation of China 52475593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting tool wear in real time is crucial to enhance the tool prognostics and health monitoring system in computerized numerical control (CNC) machining. This paper proposed a novel integrated deep learning model for predicting the wear of milling tools by fusing multi-sensor features. The raw signals of vibration and cutting force acquired from the continuous cutting cycle were used to extract multi-sensor features throughout the full lifecycle of the milling tools in time, frequency, and wavelet domains, respectively. The sensitive features from these signals were identified through correlation analysis and used as input for the stacked sparse autoencoder (SSAE) model with backpropagation neural network (BPNN) as the regression layer to predict tool wear. SSAE models with different activation function configurations of hidden layers were utilized to construct deep neural network models with different prediction performance, which were taken as primary learners of integrated deep learning model. The intergrated SSAE model based on the stacking learning strategy applied the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) regression model with Bayes optimized hyperparameters as the secondary learner to predict tool wear. Compared to the single SSAE model and shallow machine learning models, the proposed method significantly improved both the prediction accuracy and reliability.

Indexed as

autoencoderdeep learningensemble learningmillingmulti-sensor fusiontool wear prediction

Identifiers

PMID40285081
PMCPMC12030833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.