ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Deep Reinforcement Learning and Graph Convolution Approach to On-Street Parking Search Navigation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sparse Subsystem Discovery for Intelligent Sensor Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Overview of Autonomous Parking Systems: Strategies, Challenges, and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient parking distribution is crucial for urban traffic management; nevertheless, variable demand and spatial disparities raise considerable obstacles. Current research emphasizes local optimization but neglects the fundamental challenges of real-time parking allocation, resulting in inefficiencies within intricate metropolitan settings. This research delineates two key issues: (1) A dynamic imbalance between supply and demand, characterized by considerable fluctuations in parking demand over time and across different locations, rendering static allocation solutions inefficient; (2) spatial resource optimization, aimed at maximizing the efficiency of limited parking spots to improve overall system performance and user satisfaction. We present a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) framework that incorporates adaptive optimization and intelligent collaboration for dynamic parking allocation to tackle these difficulties. A reinforcement learning-driven temporal decision mechanism modifies parking assignments according to real-time data, whilst a Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based spatial model elucidates inter-parking relationships to enhance allocation efficiency. Experiments utilizing actual parking data from Melbourne illustrate that Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) substantially surpasses conventional methods (FIFO, SIRO) in managing demand variability and optimizing resource distribution. A thorough quantitative investigation confirms the strength and flexibility of the suggested method in various urban contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.