ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development and Validation of a Modular Sensor-Based System for Gait Analysis and Control in Lower-Limb Exoskeletons.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebellar Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: Frequency-Specific Modulation of Human Gait.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Validation of a Sensorized Forearm Crutch for Quantifying Partial Weight-Bearing During Assisted Gait Using Optical Motion Capture and Instrumented Treadmill.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Modular Sensor-Based System for Gait Analysis and Control in Lower-Limb Exoskeletons.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An outdoor dual-task study on cognitive-motor interference during exoskeleton-assisted walking.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Design and preliminary bench-level validation of a low-cost 3D-printed hip-knee exoskeleton for lower-limb rehabilitation training.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With rapid advancements in lower-limb exoskeleton hardware, two key challenges persist: the accurate assessment of user biomechanics and the reliable control of device behavior in real-world settings. This study presents a modular, sensor-based system designed to enhance both biomechanical evaluation and control of lower-limb exoskeletons, leveraging advanced sensor technologies and fuzzy logic. The system addresses the limitations of traditional lab-bound, high-cost methods by integrating inertial measurement units, force-sensitive resistors, and load cells into instrumented crutches and 3D-printed insoles. These components work independently or in unison to capture critical biomechanical metrics, including the anteroposterior center of pressure and crutch ground reaction forces. Data are processed in real time by a central unit using fuzzy logic algorithms to estimate gait phases and support exoskeleton control. Validation experiments with three participants, benchmarked against motion capture and force plate systems, demonstrate the system's ability to reliably detect gait phases and accurately measure biomechanical parameters. By offering an open-source, cost-effective design, this work contributes to the advancement of wearable robotics and promotes broader innovation and accessibility in exoskeleton research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.