ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Causality, Machine Learning, and Feature Selection: A Survey.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Information-Theoretic Causal Feature Selection via Markov Blanket Discovery for Stock Return Direction Prediction: Evidence from China.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Chaos-Enhanced Binary Newton-Raphson Optimizer for High-Dimensional Sensor Data Feature Selection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Arrhythmia Classification with Single-Channel Features Extracted from "A Large-Scale 12-Lead ECG Database for Arrhythmia Study".Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Robust Pavement Modulus Prediction Using Time-Structured Deep Models and Perturbation-Based Evaluation on FWD Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Understanding stress-induced illegitimate aggression: the role of physiological and psychological factors in police cadets.Biologia futura · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Causality, which involves distinguishing between cause and effect, is essential for understanding complex relationships in data. This paper provides a review of causality in two key areas: causal discovery and causal inference. Causal discovery transforms data into graphical structures that illustrate how variables influence one another, while causal inference quantifies the impact of these variables on a target outcome. The models are more robust and accurate with the integration of causal reasoning into machine learning, improving applications like prediction and classification. We present various methods used in detecting causal relationships and how these can be applied in selecting or extracting relevant features, particularly from sensor datasets. When causality is used in feature selection, it supports applications like fault detection, anomaly detection, and predictive maintenance applications critical to the maintenance of complex systems. Traditional correlation-based methods of feature selection often overlook significant causal links, leading to incomplete insights. Our research highlights how integrating causality can be integrated and lead to stronger, deeper feature selection and ultimately enable better decision making in machine learning tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.