Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285063›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Causality, Machine Learning, and Feature Selection: A Survey.

Asmae Lamsaf, Rui Carrilho, João C Neves, Hugo Proença

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asmae LamsafIT: Instituto de Telecomunicações, University of Beira Interior, 6200-001 Covilhã, Portugal.
Rui CarrilhoIT: Instituto de Telecomunicações, University of Beira Interior, 6200-001 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9997-3448
João C NevesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Beira Interior, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0139-2213
Hugo ProençaIT: Instituto de Telecomunicações, University of Beira Interior, 6200-001 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-8570

Funding

FCT/MEC through national funds and co-funded by the FEDER-PT2020 partnership agreement under the projects UIDB/50008/2020, POCI-01-0247-FEDER-033395 POCI-01-0247-FEDER-033395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causality, which involves distinguishing between cause and effect, is essential for understanding complex relationships in data. This paper provides a review of causality in two key areas: causal discovery and causal inference. Causal discovery transforms data into graphical structures that illustrate how variables influence one another, while causal inference quantifies the impact of these variables on a target outcome. The models are more robust and accurate with the integration of causal reasoning into machine learning, improving applications like prediction and classification. We present various methods used in detecting causal relationships and how these can be applied in selecting or extracting relevant features, particularly from sensor datasets. When causality is used in feature selection, it supports applications like fault detection, anomaly detection, and predictive maintenance applications critical to the maintenance of complex systems. Traditional correlation-based methods of feature selection often overlook significant causal links, leading to incomplete insights. Our research highlights how integrating causality can be integrated and lead to stronger, deeper feature selection and ultimately enable better decision making in machine learning tasks.

Indexed as

causal discoverycausal inferencecausalityfeature extractionfeature selectionmachine learningsensor data

Identifiers

PMID40285063
PMCPMC12030831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.