ArticleViruses2025
Flow Virometry in Wastewater Monitoring: Comparison of Virus-like Particles to Coliphage, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus, CrAssphage, and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of DNA Extraction Workflows for Efficient Recovery of pBI143 from Wastewater.Food and environmental virology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flow virometry (FVM) offers a promising approach for monitoring viruses and virus-like particles (VLPs) in environmental samples. This study compares levels of non-specific VLPs across a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with levels of somatic coliphage, (F+) specific coliphage, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus (PMMoV), CrAssphage (CrAss), and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV). All targets were quantified in influent, secondary-treated effluent, and tertiary-treated effluent at the University of California, Davis Wastewater Treatment Plant (UCDWWTP) over 11 weeks. We established an FVM-gating boundary for VLPs using bacteriophages T4 and ϕ6 as well as four phages isolated from wastewater. We then utilize T4 alongside three submicron beads as quality controls in the FVM assay. Coliphage was measured by standard plaque assays, and genome copies of PMMoV, CrAss, and ToBRFV were measured by digital droplet (dd)PCR. FVM results for wastewater revealed distinct microbial profiles at each treatment stage. However, correlations between VLPs and targeted viruses were poor. Trends for virus inactivation and removal, observed for targeted viruses during wastewater treatment, were consistent with expectations. Conversely, VLP counts were elevated in the WWTP effluent relative to the influent. Additional sampling revealed a decrease in VLP counts during the filtration treatment step following secondary treatment but a substantial increase in VLPs following ultraviolet disinfection. Defining application boundaries remain crucial to ensuring meaningful data interpretation as flow cytometry and virometry take on greater significance in water quality monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.