Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285005›Full record

ArticleViruses2025

A Scoping Review on Progression Towards Freedom from Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) and the Role of the PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool (PMAT).

Dinara Imanbayeva, Maria Sol Pérez Aguirreburualde, Whitney Knauer, Azimkhan Tegzhanov, Valeriia Yustyniuk, Jonathan Arzt, Andres Perez, Felix Njeumi, Satya Parida

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dinara ImanbayevaCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Maria Sol Pérez AguirreburualdeCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Whitney KnauerDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-6285
Azimkhan TegzhanovNational Veterinary Reference Center, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-7564-9750
Valeriia YustyniukCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Jonathan ArztUS Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7517-7893
Andres PerezCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Felix NjeumiFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.
Satya ParidaFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-9461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) is a highly contagious viral disease of small ruminants that severely threatens rural livelihoods and global food security. Under the Global Framework for the Progressive Control of Transboundary Animal Diseases (GF-TADs), the international animal health community has set the ambitious goal of eradicating PPR by 2030. However, significant disparities persist in the progression of PPR control across regions. This scoping review assesses the setbacks, deviations, and progress of 42 countries in Eastern, Western, and Northern Africa, as well as West Eurasia, toward achieving official freedom-from-PPR status. Progress was evaluated across key areas using the stepwise PPR Global Control and Eradication Strategy (GCES) approach and the PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool (PMAT). The eligibility criteria included PubMed peer-reviewed studies, FAO/WOAH reports, presentations, guidelines, and country/region-specific PPR control plans from 2014 through 2024. The data are generated using qualitative and quantitative analyses, including spatial mapping and GCES stepwise progress evaluation. The findings reveal that many (31%) countries in the assessed regions remain in Stage 1 of the Progressive Stepwise Approach, whereas 59.5% have reached Stages 2 and 3, and only 4.8% are in Stage 4. Countries in Western Eurasia have achieved significant progress towards PPR control, with countries achieving PPR-free status, whereas, compared to Eastern and Northern Africa, the Western African region remains in the early control stages due to infrastructure gaps and resource constraints. Additionally, the recent suspension of PPR-free status in Romania, Greece and Hungary following disease emergence underscored vulnerabilities in historically free countries. The analysis results reiterate the critical role of regional collaboration, surveillance tools, and the integration of wildlife monitoring in advancing PPR control. These insights provide actionable pathways to addressing persistent barriers, highlighting the importance of adaptable, evidence-based approaches in achieving the global goal of PPR eradication by 2030.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringPeste-des-Petits-RuminantsAnimalsDisease EradicationGlobal HealthPeste-des-petits-ruminants virusRuminantsGlobal Framework for the Progressive Control of Transboundary Animal Diseases (GF-TADs)PPR controlPPR-endemic countriesPPR eradicationPPR Global Control and Eradication Strategy (GCES)Progressive Stepwise Approachtransboundary animal diseases

Identifiers

PMID40285005
PMCPMC12031480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.