SynthesisViruses2025
Prevalence of HHV-6 Detection Among People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is a ubiquitous virus with significant implications for immunocompromised individuals, particularly people living with HIV (PLWH). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of HHV-6 detection in blood samples among PLWH using molecular diagnostic techniques. A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases until September 2024, including studies that reported HHV-6 detection in blood samples of PLWH through molecular methods. The meta-analysis calculated pooled prevalence rates using a random-effects model and assessed study quality, with additional analyses for outlier identification and influential study effects. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, and the random-effects model estimated the prevalence of HHV-6 detection at 11.7% (95% CI: 4.3-21.8%), with considerable heterogeneity. Influence diagnostics identified one study as influential, and after its exclusion, the recalculated pooled prevalence was 8% (95% CI: 4.4-12.4%), with reduced but still considerable heterogeneity. This meta-analysis highlights the prevalence of HHV-6 detection in PLWH, emphasizing the need for ongoing research to explore the clinical implications and factors influencing viral detection as well as the implications of this coinfection on the treatment and overall health of PLWH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.