ArticleViruses2025
The Virus Entry Pathway Determines Sensitivity to the Antiviral Peptide TAT-I24.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of Novel TAT-I24-Related Peptides with Antiviral Activities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The peptide TAT-I24, a fusion of the TAT peptide (amino acids 48-60) and the 9-mer peptide I24, has been previously shown to neutralize several double-stranded (ds) DNA viruses in vitro. We have now extended the testing to potentially sensitive RNA viruses and analyzed the antiviral effect of the peptide against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). In Vero E6 cells, TAT-I24 neutralized the human 2019-nCoV isolate (Wuhan variant) in a dose-dependent manner, while it was unable to neutralize two SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, Delta and Omicron. Moreover, TAT-I24 could not significantly neutralize any of the SARS-CoV-2 variants in the human lung carcinoma cell line Calu-3, which provides an alternative entry route for SARS-CoV-2 by direct membrane fusion. Therefore, a possible dependence on virus uptake by endocytosis was investigated by exposing Vero E6 cells to chloroquine (CQ), an inhibitor of endosomal acidification. The Wuhan variant was highly sensitive to inhibition by CQ, an effect which was further enhanced by TAT-I24, while the Delta variant was less sensitive to inhibition by higher concentrations of CQ compared to the Wuhan variant. The microscopic analysis of COS-7 cells using a rhodamine-labeled TAT-I24 (Rho-TAT-I24) showed the endosomal localization of fluorescent TAT-I24 and co-localization with transfected GFP-Rab14 but not GFP-Rab5. As these proteins are found in distinct endosomal pathways, our results indicate that the virus entry pathway determines sensitivity to the peptide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.