Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40284886›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Standardization of Beef, Pork, Chicken, and Soy Protein Extracts for Patch Testing and Their Accuracy in Diagnosing Adverse Food Reactions in Dogs with Chronic Pruritus.

Raniere Gaertner, Vanessa Cunningham Gmyterco, Júlia Só Severo, Camilla Alcalá, Maicon Roberto Paulo, Ruan Daros, Marconi Rodrigues de Farias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raniere GaertnerPostgraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, 1155 Imaculada Conceição Street, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1201-2183
Vanessa Cunningham GmytercoPostgraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, 1155 Imaculada Conceição Street, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9102-1066
Júlia Só SeveroPostgraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, 1155 Imaculada Conceição Street, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3358-4826
Camilla AlcaláPostgraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, 1155 Imaculada Conceição Street, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-8366
Maicon Roberto PauloPostgraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, 1155 Imaculada Conceição Street, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9156-0040
Ruan DarosEthoLab-Applied Ethology and Animal Welfare Lab, Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-1648
Marconi Rodrigues de FariasPostgraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, 1155 Imaculada Conceição Street, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4428-1767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1): Background: This study aimed to evaluate the concentrations of four proteins for allergic patch testing (APT) in dogs, assessing sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), reactions to adhesives/containers, and the safety of APT with food proteins in dogs. (2) Methods: For evaluation, 43 dogs were screened and divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 20 healthy dogs, and Group 2 included 23 dogs with canine atopic dermatitis (AD). Group 1 underwent allergic patch testing (APT) with beef, pork, chicken, and soy proteins at four different concentrations (100 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg, 1000 mg/0.2 mL). Of the 23 dogs included in Group 2, four did not undergo the elimination diet and were excluded, leaving 17 dogs in the study. They underwent an elimination diet (ED) and were evaluated using the pruritus visual analog scale (pVAS) and lesion scores (CADESI-4) before and after the ED (days 0 and 45). After the ED, Group 2 was subjected to APT (using the same proteins and concentrations as Group 1) and an oral provocation test (OPT) with the proteins used in the APT. The results of the OPT were used to assess the accuracy of the APT. (3) Results: In Group 1, one dog reacted to the APT. In Group 2, after 45 days of ED, of the 17 dogs included, 13 showed a reduction in pVAS and CADESI-4 scores (

Indexed as

atopic dermatitiscutaneous adverse food reactionsfood patch tests

Identifiers

PMID40284886
PMCPMC12030897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.