ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Associations Between Thoracic Ultrasound Chute-Side Evaluations and 60-Day Outcomes in Feedyard Cattle at Time of First Treatment for Respiratory Disease.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review: Bovine Respiratory Disease, Current Insights into Epidemiology, Diagnostic Challenges, and Vaccination.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Thoracic Ultrasonography in Calves: A Narrative Review of Techniques and Reporting Practices.Journal of veterinary internal medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prognosis at first treatment for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is essential for timely interventions and management decisions. This cross-sectional observational study evaluated 819 commercial beef feedyard cattle at chute-side for first BRD treatment. Logistic regression models examined potential associations between two outcomes-first treatment failure (requiring additional treatment) and unfinished treatment (due to mortality or culling)-and several explanatory variables, including sex, days on feed, bodyweight, breed, pulse oximetry, lung auscultation scores, and ultrasound lung scores (ULS) measured in the caudo-dorsal lung region. Animals that ultimately did not finish treatment were significantly more likely to present a ULS of 5 (74%) compared with those scored 1-4 (18-38%). Similarly, cattle with a ULS of 5 had a much higher probability of first treatment failure (74%) than those with scores of 1-3 (35-41%). Moreover, three or more B-lines in the ultrasound image or a "moth sign" finding were both strongly associated with increased probability of negative outcomes. These results highlight key ultrasound-based and demographic factors that serve as practical prognostic indicators for cattle at the onset of BRD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.