ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Breed-Specific Variations in Vertebral Right Heart Index (VRHi): Implications for Detection of True and False Right Heart Enlargement (RHE) in Dogs.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated breed-specific variations in vertebral right heart index (VRHi) values and their diagnostic accuracy in detecting right heart enlargement (RHE) in dogs. A total of 359 dogs from various breeds, including brachycephalic and non-brachycephalic groups, were evaluated using radiographic and echocardiographic methods. The VRHi was measured from lateral (RL) and ventrodorsal (VD) thoracic radiographs. Certain breeds, such as brachycephalic dogs, Schnauzers, Dachshunds, Pomeranians, Yorkshire Terriers, and Miniature Pinschers, demonstrated significantly higher VRHi values than non-brachycephalic breeds, even without true RHE. The RL VRHi showed stronger clinical relevance than the VD VRHi, correlating better with the echocardiographic findings. Breed-specific diagnostic cutoff values were established: RL VRHi ≥ 3.45 vertebral units (v) (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 75%) and VD VRHi ≥ 2.75 v (sensitivity: 72%, specificity: 72%) for brachycephalic breeds and RL VRHi ≥ 3.25 v (sensitivity: 78%, specificity: 80%), VD VRHi ≥ 2.4 v (sensitivity: 61%, specificity: 61%) for non-brachycephalic breeds not belonging to the aforementioned categories. Body weight and chest conformation showed no significant association with VRHi values. These findings highlight the necessity of considering breed-specific factors in radiographic cardiac evaluations, as some breeds may present radiographic signs of RHE despite a normal cardiac anatomy and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.